Looking for Leaders in All the Wrong Places

Posted on 17. Jan, 2012 by in Guidance for Good, Nonprofit, Recruiting

Have you had the experience of wondering if the person in charge of your business or nonprofit understood that power was not synonymous with leadership? What is often lacking is emotional intelligence — which is about how leaders handle themselves, their relationships and their world.

In recruiting for leaders of organizations in today’s rapidly changing environment, nothing is more central to a dynamic organization than its leader’s ability to deal with complexity, ambiguity, and uncertainty while guiding their teams to adapt and flourish in continual change.

When you are selecting a leader for your organization, here are several key points to consider, so you can distinguish managers from leaders and individual contributors from collaborative partners:

  • Have they positioned an organization to carry out their vision, and was it attainable?
  • Did their style of influence attract and energize people or did they manage by manipulation and punishments?
  • Can they describe how they coached to promote competencies?
  • How did they create achievable, challenging expectations, and how did they reward progress?
  • Have they valued loyalty over creativity?
  • How have they created high-performing teams?
  • Do they assess and encourage risk or look at every opportunity with their risk-averse blinders?

You don’t want people “cutting their teeth” at your organization’s expense! Leadership is an art — intellect and degrees do not determine capability. Just because someone tells you they are ready for leadership, be certain they can pass the above litmus test. Remember, this is the difference between selecting a date for the prom and selecting a marriage partner; the prom is a big splash but it’s just one night …

Taking a Risk

Posted on 29. Jul, 2011 by in Guidance for Good, Recruiting

As a rule, big foundations and nonprofit trade associations have recently tended to rely on large search firms, such as Russell Reynolds Associates and Spencer Stuart, for their pursuit of top executive candidates. While very professional and exceedingly sensitive to board sensibilities, these 800-pound gorillas of the search world often fail to recruit exciting, edgy, courageous, and out-of-the-box leaders. Their Rolodexes are full of safe, credentialed and academically pedigreed people who are suited for normal management positions but not for innovative, risk-taking and creative opportunities. Too often, they are afraid to present some of the best candidates who are edgy or controversial for fear of not pleasing the board.

If a major nonprofit or foundation needs a search firm, it would be well advised to turn to a smaller, more adventurous, and plucky firm which can deliver the type of inspired, visionary leaders that challenging times like these demand.

Planning to Succeed: Creating a Succession Plan

Posted on 15. Jul, 2011 by in Nonprofit

If your leader leaves, do you have a plan to avoid a crisis?

A few months ago, the executive director of a small arts nonprofit felt a crisis coming on.

He enjoyed his work immensely but wasn’t sure if the organization was the best vehicle for the kind of art he wanted to produce. Rather than bottling up his concerns, he brought them to his board members, who were supportive of his efforts to reconcile his artistic vision with the requirements of his position.

Still, it left the board with an unsettling question: “What do we do if he leaves?”

Avoid the Pitfalls of Departure

When a nonprofit leader leaves unexpectedly, it’s a crisis point that — if handled poorly — can jeopardize an organization’s operation. But organizations that prepare for the unexpected find that succession planning eases transitions.

The reasons for a leader’s departure affect an organization’s response to it. Executives leaving for personal reasons provoke different questions than if they move to a competing organization. Moreover, an unforeseen health condition or death will add emotions of concern and grief to the situation.

If you’re left without a leader, don’t rush to action. Take your time, giving people the chance to talk about what’s happened and come to terms with it. Communicate honestly with everyone, including paid and volunteer staff, board members, funders, and the community.

The Role of the Interim Executive Director

Appointing an interim director during the transition can help ensure stability and maintain the confidence of your stakeholders. Ideally, this person will function both as an executive director, leading the organization, and as a consultant, providing an external, neutral opinion on both process and substance. An interim is helpful during both planned, non-confrontational transitions and more volatile situations that involve firing an executive director. The board should require the interim leader to do the following:

  • Keep the day-to-day operations of the organization moving forward.
  • Provide leadership for staff, who may be worried about the future. Keep morale high.
  • Assess financial stability, financial controls, and financial practices.
  • Evaluate the organizational structure and all internal management practices.
  • Analyze program strengths and weaknesses.
  • Provide consulting guidance to the board.
  • Stabilize operations and the organization’s reputation to help attract good candidates for the new executive director position.

When hiring the interim director, it’s best to work with a contract period of at least three months, with negotiable renewal periods. You’ll need three or four months to attract candidates, arrange interviews, and negotiate an offer. The hiring process may take even longer if the organization is perceived by potential candidates as being in disarray. An interim can continue to make organizational changes that make the job more desirable to candidates.

Done thoughtfully, the search process can turn a potential crisis into an opportunity to focus your mission and serve your community. Appointing an interim executive director will give you time to engage in self-analysis as you search for a replacement. Your work during this period can result in a greater awareness of your organization’s strengths and challenges and a shared vision of where you want to go.

The Big Picture: Succession Planning

The best leadership succession plan ensures continuity, builds a legacy, and leads to an orderly transition. The key is to build a solid foundation well in advance of the actual succession date. Here are essential strategies:

  • Make sure all the organization’s leaders, including board members and senior managers, collaborate to develop a plan for exiting and incoming leaders.
  • Set up a board-appointed search committee that could include staff representation. Have this committee examine the organization’s vision. The vision statement should describe the organization in five years and the qualities required of a CEO to lead toward that vision.
  • Build the senior team’s business and leadership skills.
  • Plan the development and retention of key staff.
  • Document procedures to support the effective transfer of knowledge. Be sure that new leaders fit into your culture. If you’re left without a leader, don’t rush to action.
  • Implement a strategic plan that includes succession planning.
  • Identify gaps between required leadership and existing talent.
  • Decide if a new leader can be promoted from within or if an external search is required.
  • Evaluate your organization’s culture, and be sure that new leaders fit into this culture.

No succession plan will answer all the questions that come up after a leader leaves. But a good plan will give people confidence that the most important answers have been considered.

This article was published originally in Nonprofit World, Volume 29, Number 3, May/June 2011.

Older Entries »